A "Montage" of Links & Commentary
- 1/1/2009
Classic Article on A Christmas Carol: Read Butler Shaffer's "The Case for Ebeneezer" at LRC.
VDare.com is having their annual War Against Christmas Competition. See Tom Piatak's report.
The Bubble Economy.
Read "Evidence that the Fed Caused the Housing Boom" by Robert Murphy.
In February look for a book on this economic depression by Thomas Woods. I am happy to report that a mainstream publisher, Regnery, is publishing it. This will increase the book's exposure to people who are unfamiliar with Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard.
Listen to the 1992 Mises Institute conference on Money and the Federal Reserve.
Read Peter Schiff at Taki's Magazine.
Hear the great Jim Rogers on The Lew Rockwell Show.
"Barack Obama," Chris Brown writes, "plans to initiate public-private partnerships."
"Obama's 'New Deal'" by Jeffery Kuhner.
"Garet Garrett knew where FDR's policies—and Bush's—would lead," says Justin Raimondo in The American Conservative.
George Smith writes about the evil Alexander Hamilton, founding father of crony capitalism.
The Fascist Market: Timothy Carney, author of The Big Ripoff: How Big Business and Big Government Steal Your Money, is interviewed in The University Bookman.
In my view, this deep alliance is a topic that too often gets overlooked, even by those who claim to be supporters of the free market. It can drive one mad how so many men frame arguments around the premise that today's economy is "free," or around the premise that the regulatory state was primarily created to "protect" consumers or small upstart businesses.
One gentleman, it is said, that explodes these myths is Gabriel Kolko. In Murray Rothbard's writings you will sometimes find references to his works, even though Dr. Kolko is a Marxist------By the way, read the new article, which mentions Kolko, by Dylan Hales called "Left Turn Ahead."
For example, in "Left and Right: The Prospects for Liberty" Rothbard wrote:
In The Triumph of Conservatism, Kolko traces the origins of political capitalism in the "reforms" of the Progressive Era. Orthodox historians have always treated the Progressive period (roughly 1900–1916) as a time when free-market capitalism was becoming increasingly "monopolistic"; in reaction to this reign of monopoly and big business, so the story runs, altruistic intellectuals and far-seeing politicians turned to intervention by the government to reform and to regulate these evils. Kolko's great work demonstrates that the reality was almost precisely the opposite of this myth. Despite the wave of mergers and trusts formed around the turn of the century, Kolko reveals, the forces of competition on the free market rapidly vitiated and dissolved these attempts at stabilizing and perpetuating the economic power of big business interests. It was precisely in reaction to their impending defeat at the hands of the competitive storms of the market that big business turned, increasingly after the 1900s, to the federal government for aid and protection. In short, the intervention by the federal government was designed, not to curb big business monopoly for the sake of the public weal, but to create monopolies that big business (as well as trade associations of smaller business) had not been able to establish amidst the competitive gales of the free market.
When a man says we "must" have this or that regulation against laissez-faire capitalism, I often wonder: Who will regulate the regulator?
H.L. Mencken Club.
In late November they had their very first annual meeting.
Addresses Online:
- “Hear No Genes, See No Genes, Speak No Genes--the Jargon of ‘Culturalism’” by John Derbyshire. (The text of Mr. Derbyshire's speech is just excellent. I am not sure how he writes for National Review.)
- “The Decline and Rise of the Alternative Right” by Paul Gottfried.
- “Greek to Us: The Death of Classical Education and Its Consequences” by E. Christian Kopff.
- “The Old Right and the Antichrist” by Richard Spencer.
Even though I am not an atheist, I'm okay with cooperating with those who are (in a non-militant sense). It is independent of being opposed to fascism and socialism. There were, of course, plenty of nonreligious gentlemen in the Old Right. (Rothbard, one of my heroes, was an agnostic.) However I agree with paleoconservatives when they say that traditional conservatism----in a cultural sense----cannot be atheistic. If it is to conserve the natural, the good, the transcendent, and the normal, then a conservatism that defends Western Civilization cannot leave behind its religious roots. That should be obvious.
Take a look at Joe Sobran's 1999 article "Christianity and History."
James Bovard: "Are Democrats Better on Privacy and Surveillance?" Ha-ha.
"Police Have Killed 400 With Tasers Since 2001."
"Obama Finds Favor with Neoconservatives," writes Paul Gottfried.
"Blagojevich, Obama, And The Diversity–Fueled 'Chicago Way'" by Steve Sailer-----And see his new book America's Half-Blood Prince.
"In Praise of McCarthyism" by Justin Raimondo.
Ron Paul is interviewed at Huffington Post.
Patrick Keeney writes about Theodore Dalrymple's new book, The Politics and Culture of Decline. He is additionally the author of In Praise of Prejudice.
See Clyde Wilson's "Nathaniel Macon and The Way Things Should Be" at Chronicles.
Stateless Proprietary Communities: I was going to type up a separate larger entry on this but decided not to. Instead, please allow me to leave you all with a few articles by anthropologist Spencer Health MacCallum on this subject...
- “The Enterprise of Community: Market Competition, Land, and Environment.”
- “Land Policy and the Open Community: The Anarchist Case for Land-Leasing versus Subdivision.”
- “The Quickening of Social Evolution: Perspectives on Proprietary (Entrepreneurial) Communities.”
- “The Social Nature of Ownership.”
- “Werner K. Stiefel's Pursuit of a Practicum of Freedom.”